Bora 65 Backpack Men's
$380.00
1 / 9
Bora 65 Backpack Men's
Rating Distribution
Select a row below to filter reviews.
5 starsstars
12
12 reviews with 5 stars.
4 starsstars
5
5 reviews with 4 stars.
3 starsstars
2
2 reviews with 3 stars.
2 starsstars
1
1 review with 2 stars.
1 starstars
2
2 reviews with 1 star.
Overall Rating
4.1
13 out of 17 (76%) reviewers recommend this product
Review this product
Select to rate the item with 1 star. This action will open submission form.
Select to rate the item with 2 stars. This action will open submission form.
Select to rate the item with 3 stars. This action will open submission form.
Select to rate the item with 4 stars. This action will open submission form.
Select to rate the item with 5 stars. This action will open submission form.
Adding a review will require a valid email for verification
Rating Summary
Size:
Size:, 3.1176470588235294 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
Quality of Product
Quality of Product, 4.4 out of 54.4
Durability of product
Durability of product, 4.0 out of 54.0
Comfort
Comfort, 3.5 out of 53.5
product features
satisfaction
compartments
weight
comfort
accessibility
zipper
purchase
9 to 22 of 22 Reviews
9 – 22 of 22 Reviews
Sort by
Featured
Missoula, Montana
Age35 to 44
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
5 out of 5 stars.
Best Bag out there
a year ago
Fantastic bag, love the articulating hip strap and waterproof material. Great innovative features.
Q: Size Purchased:
A: Reg.
Q: Activity
A: Backpacking
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Quality of Product
Quality of Product, 5.0 out of 55.0
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Alberta
Age25 to 34
GenderMale
3 out of 5 stars.
Must be min 32 in waist for proper hip belt fit
a year ago
Always come back to Arc’teryx for overnight packs because of the kangaroo zip front pouch. This is also one of the lightweight packs on the market. Everything you need and nothing you don't. No excessive zippers, pockets, and features like osprey packs.
However, the greatness of the backpack is all for not, if it doesn't fit. Hipbelt only comes in one size which is annoying. I am about a size 30 inch waist, and when I have it cinched to the max for heavier loads, the left/right hip belts touch or nearly touch and max out, leaving it looser than desire. You probably need to be a minimum 32 inch waist size for the hip belt to be fully cinched and not have the ends touch. Hope Arcteryx considers making different sized hipbelts in the future.
I have an old Altra 85 pack that had interchangeable different sized hip belts. That was the reason I chose that pack in the first place.
What a shame.
Q: Pros:
A: lightweight, functional
Q: Cons:
A: hip belt too large
Q: Size Purchased:
A: regular
Q: Activity
A: backpacking
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Quality of Product
Quality of Product, 3.0 out of 53.0
Size:
Size:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Palm Springs
Age25 to 34
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
4 out of 5 stars.
I’m surprised it doesn’t cost more.
a year ago
There’s a reason this pack has been through so many years of design change, someone at Arc new this idea would be different than anything else before. With this current iteration of the pack it’s impressive they kept the price down. The trend now seems to be, make a pack that’s ultra light and very expensive. I stopped seeing the trade off in these types of packs and realized maybe all the reviews were paid or sponsored to promote hype to sell a new product. I don’t blame these businesses but their product wasn’t for me. Instead I went with this pack that’s 2-3 pounds heavier than the competitors but hear me out. With a full carbon back plate you’ll have more strength than you need from it while being light as can be (most ultralight packs don’t have one at all.) A rotating hip belt which is unique to this pack, followed by a removable brain. Every other detail you can see for yourself in the specs. I really suggest getting this pack in hand and comparing it to the most popular ultralight one there. You’ll be confused why Arc isn’t sold out of these.
Q: Pros:
A: Comfort-Capacity-Capabilities
Q: Cons:
A: Not having a smaller size than 65L
Q: Activity
A: Backpacking/Hunting
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Grenoble
Age45 to 54
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
5 out of 5 stars.
Excellent sac !
a year ago
Je possède l'ancienne version (bleue, 50 litres), légèrement plus lourde (2,300 kg) mais avec un tissu indestructible et totalement imperméable (pas besoin de housse de pluie) : j'espère que cette nouvelle déclinaison du sac n'a pas trop sacrifié la solidité à la légèreté. J'aime beaucoup ce sac simple et efficace, sans accessoires inutiles, et notamment le système Rotoglide qui évite tout stress pour le dos quand on se penche en avant ou sur le côté : tout simplement génial et ultra-confortable ! Le capuchon est un peu trop rigide (en tout cas sur l'ancienne version bleue), et l'ouverture principale pas très commode (le cordon n'est pas très bien conçu quand on veut ouvrir en grand rapidement, surtout quand on a connu le système génial de l'Haglofs Oxo avec ses deux anneaux), je trouve aussi que la fermeture éclair sur le côté n'apporte pas grand-chose. Enfin, je préférais le serrage ventral de mon Oxo (la lanière repasse par une boucle à l'arrière de la ceinture, ce qui fait qu'on serre de l'arrière vers l'avant, donc avec plus de force et de précision). Mais ce ne sont que des critiques minimes au regard des grandes qualités de ce sac Bora, plus léger et surtout BEAUCOUP plus solide que mon ancien Oxo. Merci d'avoir enfin adopté un tarif plus réaliste, l'ancien prix (600 €) était complètement délirant et on était obligé de guetter les promotions. Sac vivement recommandé, d'un confort et d'un niveau technologique sans équivalent : bravo !!!
Translate with GoogleQ: Activity
A: Randonnée (essentiellement en montagne entre 1000 et 2500m), toutes saisons.
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Whistler BC
Age55 to 64
GenderMale
Body TypeSolid
5 out of 5 stars.
Fits great. Easy to adjust.
a year ago
I bought this back for a 10 day backpacking trip in the Arctic. It fits great, is easy to adjust, light yet rugged, and has pockets, and straps in all the right places.
Q: Pros:
A: Lightweight, rugged, adjustable,
Q: Cons:
A: None.
Q: Activity
A: Backpacking - longer trips
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Utah
Age35 to 44
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
5 out of 5 stars.
Love all the pockets and ways to store stuff!
a year ago
Just finished a 25 mile hike and this pack was perfect. I love all the places to store items that are easily accessible - so you don’t have to dig through a massive bag to find what you need. Held up well and very comfortable. Took a few minutes of hiking to get the straps the way I needed them.
Q: Pros:
A: Comfortable; tons of pockets
Q: Cons:
A: None
Q: Activity
A: Hiking
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Canmore, AB
Age25 to 34
GenderFemale
Body TypeLean
4 out of 5 stars.
Great backpack
a year ago
Bought this last week. 6' female. Brought it on a 5 day backcountry trip and was very happy with it! Had to adjust the straps to the highest setting , so if you are over 6', might want to consider getting the "tall" version. Lots of pockets and compartments to organize gear for easy access. Does not come with a rain shell (although it is gortex I think it is important to have for heavier rain), you will need to buy one separate.
Hip straps are interesting. I like the hip rotation feature. But the straps don't easily bend, so need to clip them together when storing inside or outside the tent. But not a deal breaker.
Great lower back support.
Q: Pros:
A: Back support, gortex, compartments
Q: Cons:
A: Hip straps, no rain cover
Q: Activity
A: Hiking
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Vancouver,BC
Age45 to 54
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
5 out of 5 stars.
Great fit. Plenty of adjustment.
a year ago
Had a few test hikes with the pack now and really like the fit. Size is great for our up coming adventure and I see this pack going in many more.
Q: Activity
A: Hiking & traveling
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Langley BC
Age35 to 44
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
5 out of 5 stars.
Bora - First impressions
a year ago
First time using the Bora yesterday- overall very pleased with performance and features.
It's a lightweight pack that doesn't rely on excessive padding so make sure you're fit properly. It's very customizable and the ability to adjust straps laterally to accommodate different shoulder sizes is a nice feature. The waistbelt on the large size is generous, and while I could probably go to a medium belt size I appreciated the coverage. The Rotoglide system seemed functional- while there was a slight clicking from time to time during certain movements, it didn't detract from the feeling that the load was being supported effectively.
First hike with it was a 10k overnighter in non technical terrain, one minor dip in a creek during a crossing (water-resistance is there), and a load of 31lbs. It was a hot day and airflow was good.
While it may not look as plush as other packs on the market, I was very happy with the performance but can't stress the importance of fit enough- you probably won't be sold until you've adjusted it properly and got some weight in it.
Worth considering if you're in the market.
I can't speak to longevity of the pack yet, but look forward to playing with it further.
Q: Pros:
A: Adjustability / fit , load bearing
Q: Cons:
A: Less padding than some.
Q: Activity
A: Backpacking
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Edmonton, Canada
Age35 to 44
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
3 out of 5 stars.
Decent pack. After-sale support is lacking
2 years ago
I own a Bora 80 that I purchased over twenty years ago as well as the Bora 63 and Bora 65 packs. This review is mostly for the Bora 65. First, the good: this rotoglide suspension system is great. The pack moves well with you when going over more technical terrain and manages heavy loads reasonably well. The layout of the pack is decent, top loading with side access, and pretty streamlined. While the pack is lighter than the Bora 63, it is not nearly as robust as the Bora 63 or the Bora 80 from previous generations. It also does not have a hydration bladder sleeve whereas previous iterations did. The materials used are not as durable which seems to be in line with the design philosophy that appears to have been adopted in the last decade or so of much lighter packs while sacrificing durability and longevity. I was very disappointed recently with my service call regarding my Bora 63. The Bora 63 does not come with ice axe bungee loops and Arc'teryx does not have these as a replacement part. For such an expensive pack (more so than the newer Bora 65) it is incredibly disappointing that the pack would not come with such an essential component. I'll be sticking with my Osprey Aether Plus 85 for most multi-day trips. For heavy loads and winter trips, it always made sense, but it can be compacted down well enough for shorter trips too, is durable, has great access, and all the features that you would want and many of which can be stripped away when not needed. This pack is ok, but where Arc'teryx once had my full support and trust by having their brand logo on gear, now I have to filter more carefully as there are some misses amongst many of the great products they have.
Q: Pros:
A: Roto-glide suspension system
Q: Cons:
A: The competition
Q: Activity
A: Hiking, Multi-Day Backpacking
No, I do not recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Netherlands
Age45 to 54
Body TypeAthletic
4 out of 5 stars.
Love the pack!
2 years ago
Have been on a few backpacking trips with the pack.
After an adjustment I really like the pack.
At my first multi day trip I experienced problems with the hipbelt buckle.
I had to re-fasten it every two or three hundred metres.
Fortunately, Zwerfkei, the Dutch shop where I bought the pack provided a new buckle. Contrarary to the Arc Teryx buckle this buckle is not smooth so it remains fastened even with my dynamic way of walking.
Now I really like the pack. It is very comfortable with the rotoglide system.
The big front kangaroo pocket comes in very handy. Also I like the zipped side pocket which is accessible while wearing the pack.
Missing the water blatter pouch (fixed with a light weight dry bag).
And would love the pack to be even more waterproof (like one of my former packs, the Naos 55).
Q: Pros:
A: Comfort, Adjustable fit, Pockets,
Q: Cons:
A: Smooth belt buckle No blatter pouch
Q: Activity
A: Multi day backpacking
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Montreal
Age18 to 24
GenderMale
Body TypeSlim
5 out of 5 stars.
The best trekking bag there is
2 years ago
I'm honestly amazed by how adaptable this bag is. You can adjust it to get the perfect fit. Used it for a few hiking and canoe-camping trips and hasn't let me down. Super water-resistant and durable. Only downside is the mechanism for the hip-belt that can be a bit tricky to maintain
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
0 Comments
Bergen
Age25 to 34
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
1 out of 5 stars.
Terrible hip belt
2 years ago
Just got this in the mail and I couldn't be more disappointed. The backback is full of amazing features and the build quality is great. By far the best backback I had ever seen. That was until I put it on my back. The hip belt it self has no support. This results in only one central contact point. Dead in the middle of the rotating function of the pack. The belt curves backwards towards the pack and leaves all the weight of the back centered on a small circle in the middle of your spine. The picture shows how the belt curves. It curves both on the sides as well as over and under side. The hip belt might be the most important part of the pack, and this seems to be a complete waste of what could have been an amazing pack.
Translate with GoogleQ: Pros:
A: Great functions and quality
Q: Cons:
A: Useless hip belt, useless pack.
No, I do not recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
Response from Arc'teryx:
2 years ago
Customer Service
Hello there,
Thank you for reaching out and sharing your feedback on the Bora 65 Backpack.
We're genuinely sorry to hear that you're disappointed and that it did not suit your needs.
Our customers will occasionally read these reviews, so we appreciate it when others share their experience with us, and we will be sure to pass your comments along to our design team.
If you have any additional comments or concerns, we welcome you to contact our Customer Service team, and one of our representatives would be happy to assist you.
All the best
2 Comments
a year ago
Perhaps I don't understand your point. At best, you got a really strange belt and at worst, you are misleading the readers. The belt does not naturally bend backwards, it bends away from the pack to form around your hips to support the weight. In your pictures you are clearly forcing the belt to bend backwards. Every backpack I've had in over forty years has a belt that will bend any way you want to bend it. Even though it is quite stiff around the suspension point, it will bend backwards if you force it, it's a belt. It also has one point of contact in the center - that's the whole point of the RotoGlide suspension system. The belt sits on your hips and supports the pack. Everything works and is designed as it should be.
I honestly don't mean to deny your experience, I just don't think your review conveys what your issue really is.
Was this helpful?
Vancouver, BC
Age25 to 34
GenderMale
Body TypeAthletic
4 out of 5 stars.
Comfortable for carrying upwards of 50lbs on hikes
2 years ago
Purchased this backpack to be my workhorse this summer for hiking and working in the mountains. I have to carry 40-50lbs of camera gear on 30km hiking days and I was very pleased with the comfort, even after multiple days. The way the backpack placement is customizable and moves with your body is a spectacular feature. My only criticism would be not including a protective place for a water bladder and not including a rain cover.
Q: Pros:
A: Lightweight, ergonomic fit, pockets
Q: Cons:
A: No bladder housing or rain cover
Q: Activity
A: Multi day hikes, Camping
Yes, I recommend this product.
Was this helpful?
Size:
Size:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Much Smaller than Expected and 5 equals to Much Larger than Expected
Much Smaller than Expected
Much Larger than Expected
1 Comment
2 years ago
Isn’t the fabric waterproof my pack previous model is the Bora 63 is waterproof, also there’s a bladder packed in the back
Was this helpful?
9 – 22 of 22 Reviews
Bora 65 Backpack
65L backpack with RotoGlide™ hipbelt for outstanding balance and carry comfort.
$380.00
Free shipping & Free returns
Bora 65 Backpack Men's
Weekend or a week, the Bora 65’s comfortable carry helps you push farther and discover new terrain. Its RotoGlide™ hipbelt moves with you for better balance and stride, locks out for added stability. GridLock™ harness adjustability creates a precision fit, and the thermoformed Tegris® frame sheet and aluminum stays add support. High-tenacity Cordura® pack cloth is backcountry durable, and the lid’s Weather Vault provides waterproof storage. The main compartment is easy to access – from top or side – and multiple external pockets keep necessities at hand and wet gear outside.
Bora
Multi-day trekking products that are durable and functional in mountain environments.
Trail
For technical mountain activities, durable and protective designs with a focus on freedom of movement for remote and varied conditions.
Synthetic fibre
Engineered materials that offer enhanced properties or performance.
Multi-day packs
Optimized for load stability, energy efficient carry and function with an emphasis on durability.